Donations to the archive would be appreciated to help fund our server hardware & storage drives. We are looking for developers to help build new software and archives, discuss here.
Search will be down for a day or two for maintenance.
>Spend entire life before WWII in boy scouts, military schools, and West Point >Spend WWII as an artillery commander in North Africa/Europe >Spend time between WWII/Korea at the Army War College, do some paratrooper training on the side >Spend the aftermath of Kroea on a business degree, a biographer even referred to him as a "a corporation executive in uniform." >Finally gets the opportunity to be put in charge of his own war in 1964 >Has a bunch of ridiculous and bizarre restrictions and allowances placed on him that virtually tie an arm around his back and fuck his brain, which was indoctrinated at West Point and affirmed by his WWII/Korea experience to fight big conventional wars like Korea or Western Europe >Proceeds to laser-focus on fighting large pitched battles, having numerical and materiel superiority, and maintaining force quality as if he were fighting a conventional war anyway despite it making no strategic sense at all >Manages to gain the upper hand despite coping about the strategic picture ridiculously, like near-Shoigu levels >loses war after coming within a hair of victory after the Tet Offensive >Never heard from again and is widely considered the worst general the U.S had post-Civil War Was he autistic? I feel like if he were in a conventional war he'd be the best general ever; yet instead he was in charge of a complicated unconventional proxy conflict with nonsensical rules of engagement that required far more unconventional methods and strategy.
I am a muslim from India and we're been oppressed and killed by the current regime. Muslims live in small pre-ww2 era jewish like ghettos across India and there isn't a majority area except kashmir. How would we resist if we wanted to? >one of the poorest grps in India >political leaders being jailed, blackmailed or killed >muslims full of inbreds >jobs and businesses dependent on hindus >bankrupt pakistan won't support us >USA is investing alot in India to counter china >armed government sponsered militias lynching and killing muslims >muslim ghettos full of spies and government agents >indo-pak border is korea tier >population too big to migrate like rohingyas >guns aren't easily available like the middle east >hindus highly genocidal tier radicalized I know guys on /his/ are experts on this shit so give us advice. >inb4 pajeets start seething
Did they really reach China and occupy that region? If the answer is yes, what was their influence? I didn't find many articles about it, just Turkish nationalism.
I refuse to believe modern Greeks have anything to with ancient Greeks. Modern Greeks are an Arab-like population who don’t contribute a single thing to society, they are also low iq, short, brown and overall dysgenic
So human history goes from Stone Age to Bronze Age to Iron Age, and then to Ancient Times to Medieval Times to Modern Times, right? But why does the Iron Age end before antiquity? They didn’t stop using iron during antiquity, did they? And how come there’s no “Steel Age” and “Inox Age”?
I never quite understood why it is that the Iron Age isn't said to have gone all the way up to like around the year 1855 CE. Then have the Steel Age start at 1855 CE and continue until the present.
Or have the Bronze Age get lumped into the Copper Age and have it run from circa 5000 BCE to 1200 BCE. Then have the Iron Age absorb the Steel Age so that we can be said to still be living in the Iron Age.
Why not go about it the way geologists have and use various tiers like "eons", "epochs", "eras", "periods", "ages", etc. and use the names of such ages and make them applicable universally instead of using random arbitrary ones like "Middle Ages" and "Renaissance"?
How the actual fuck is Revelations considered Biblical canon? No seriously, there's no precedent for it before in the Bible at all and it has so much more specific and startling imagery compared to anything else that came before, and was written by an individual decades after the time of Jesus, and is expressly stated to have been a series of visions that are just treated as fact for some reason? It's completely random that it's just accepted as 100% Biblical canon by the vast majority of Christians. Like seriously what the actual fuck is it doing in the Bible, it feels like it's just randomly tacked on at the end.
