Donations to the archive would be appreciated to help fund our server hardware & storage drives. We are looking for developers to help build new software and archives,
discuss here .
Search will be down for a day or two for maintenance.
Anonymous
Have liberal-democracy fans ever been able to explain this?
Anonymous
>>16439985 Why did they only do this well in that particular olympics?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>16438930 olympics have always been rigged
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>16438930 Dude, you can check any other Olympics and more often that not the host country has the most medals.
Anonymous
>>16440871 Presumably one of the factors is the government's investment into athletes. Nazis cares a lot about propaganda production and national pride.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>16441598 'Presumably' isn't really the level of proof I'm looking for
Anonymous
The Irish, Japanese, mexicans, jews or French never faced as much discrimination as italians did. Why? Only blacks suffered more for obvious reasons. Why did the biggest lynching in lousiana was about killing italians? Bonus question? Are european Americans going to be the most discriminated group of the future?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>16373623 organized crime
Anonymous
Quoted By:
sage and report ;) noko
Anonymous
>>16373623 >The Irish, Japanese, or French never faced as much discrimination as italians did. Because those three are White, unlike Italians.
>mexicans, jews They faced as much discrimination as italians did.
Anonymous
>>16374019 The jews were never discriminated against
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
What is the answer to the current Israel-Palestine problem? Do you think this is a reasonable solution?>Armistice between Israelis and Gaza >Implementation of a singular secular state in the Levant where all ethnicities, Arab, Jewish or otherwise, are given equal rights, opportunity and freedom of movement, religion and opinion >Leaders and combatants from both Hamas and Netanyahu's government are put on trial for war crimes and crimes against humanity, if found guilty, all involved governments, parties and institutions are to be immediately disbanded and apprehended >A Marshall Plan-like collective effort between countries to rebuild destroyed and damaged properties, villages and cities like Gaza >Families and descendants of Palestinians and native ethnic peoples expelled and displaced from the Levant in the Nakba and afterwards are allowed and given resources to return to Palestine and their original homes >Those that don't want to return will be given reparation payment for compensation instead >Palestine will be allowed entry into the UN, Non-Aligned Movement and the Arab League when Arabs become the majority. But the trade-off is:>Jerusalem will be the Capital but the secular government will not interfere in the operations of the Old City unless it is to ease or curb tensions >Allow the Temple Mount to be operated co-jointly by the Jordanian Waqf and Israeli Temple Institute >Allow the building of the new Jewish Temple beside the Dome of the Rock on the Northern Garden without destroying any existing structures, as shown in pic related >Jews will be allowed to visit the Temple Mount, although they generally don't want to since it is too sacred for them to just walk into, unless it is a chosen group of religious Jewish officials doing prayers and services in the new Temple >A platoon of UN peacekeeping/international troops is placed to enforce order in the Old City That way, both Israelis and Palestinians get something out of it. Or is this still too much?
Anonymous
>>16386316 Sometimes, I do wonder what would happen if the ideology of Zionism was never invented and/or if after the fall of the Ottoman Turks in WWI, the Arabs were allowed their own state to govern from Mesopotamia to the edge of the Arabian Peninsula, including Palestine? Perhaps a more peaceful or at least stable Middle East?
Anonymous
>>16386338 Certainly, but even without zionism, the Middle East can never be completely peaceful as long as islam is what it is.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>16386316 >Unironically there is none. Both sides are ethnocentric and fully convinced they alone are in the right religiously and politically speaking. This shows the failure of semitic morality to solve such problems. This just proves that the Israel-Palestine problem, and by extension, parts of the Middle East, are relics of centuries to millennia-old tribalistic mindsets, medieval ignorance and perpetual hatred of enemies that refuse to adapt or be discarded for the modern world, for the greater good of all, because if there's one thing these peoples value above their ethnicity, positions and even their own lives, it's their religion. Many Jews see themselves as God's perfect chosen people, damn everyone else. And Palestinians are always Muslims first and Arabs second. Because if the trade-off of the right of return for Palestinians is the right for Jews to get access to the Temple Mount and even an opportunity to rebuild their Temple, they'd say "no" flat-out.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
This thread was moved to
>>>/pol/461627809 Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>16386368 The Middle East has never been peaceful anyway. It's always been the most violent and war-ridden region in the world for all of human history.
And say what you will about Islam, in its first centuries of existence, it unified and brought the entire region to an era of relative progress and peace... for about a century or two before the religion was fragmented.
Anonymous
Why do muslims despise art? Are they stupid?
Anonymous
>>15991587 Iran and Turkey have decent artists, film directors, and musicians, you fucking cunt.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>15991614 Don't look at the reflection of yourself in a pond, you faggot!
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>15991587 Their creator was really wary of Islam getting subverted so manipulative expressions like art and music got banned
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>15993557 Iran is shia and Turkey is secular
Anonymous
Anonymous
what US president has the worst defenders on /his/ and why is it Nixon? even his most diehard defenders can't name anything constructive he accomplished.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>16010929 People have made comparisons between Meatball Ron and Tricky Dick.
>On the campaign trail, DeSantis frequently behaves like he’s been dragged to a house party and is counting the seconds until he can look at his phone. He dryly remarked to an Icee-slurping kid, “That’s probably a lot of sugar,” and to a crowd of gathered fans that it was past his bedtime. When a reporter asked why he wasn’t taking questions, he snapped, “Are you blind?” He has a strange laugh that transforms abruptly into an okay-what’s-next industriousness. He passes up even obvious opportunities to show empathy, like when an 81-year-old veteran struggled to read the Pledge of Allegiance at his inauguration as Florida governor. Rather than take the man’s arm and offer help, my colleague Helen Lewis wrote, “DeSantis stood rigid and stern.” Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>16005065 >diehard defenders can't name anything constructive he accomplished. Amtrak my beloved
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>16005065 I'd say Reagan has the worst defenders, desu, if only because they only exist to be contrarian and barely make an effort for his defense. At least Nixonites can talk about how memorable their guy was and the Shakespearian atmosphere of his story, often getting into his White House shenanigans and private discussions, but what do Reaganites do? Basically, just copy-paste the same two sentences in defense of the guy and leave the thread.
Anonymous
>Nixon's early days as a lawyer in Whittier in the late 1930s saw him, among other things, handle family law cases, something he was not psychologically cut out for and ended up handing them off to his law partner. As he recalled, "I remember handling a divorce involving a lady, a really good-looking lady, I should add, whose reason for separating from her husband was his unsatisfying performance in the bedroom. I practically turned red in the face. Maybe my family wasn't quite modern enough, but I was raised to believe some things ought to stay private."
Anonymous
Anonymous
The moors.... were like that?! Looks like EEF for me lol
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Looks like the pajeeta I went to school with
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>16320015 Unironically looks like a composite of the Arab girls I've known and seen, so I guess if they wanted to model that they succeeded, but I'm not sure if Moors really looked like that, since North Africans have a significant SSA component and they probably had some local admixture.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>16321918 normal people don't, she looks like some random brown shitskin, i think americans entered the thread, i can recognize their american posts
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>16322483 >thread bumped at page 1 >poster count not increased stop bumping your own thread faggot
Anonymous
Quoted By:
If your anus tingles while watching this then you are destined to go to hell and suck satans bbc for all eternity. Repent faggots
Anonymous
Quoted By:
timmy do be kinda horny doebeit
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>lose 0.01% of your territory >"century of humilliation" >muh imperialism are chinese retarded
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>15569575 Japan never had prostitutes and developed their culture entirely separately to China. Their culture has been continuous from before Meiji.
>The Tale of Genji is an important work of Japanese literature, and modern authors have cited it as inspiration, such as Jorge Luis Borges who said of it, "The Tale of Genji, as translated by Arthur Waley, is written with an almost miraculous naturalness, and what interests us is not the exoticism—the horrible word—but rather the human passions of the novel. Such interest is just: Murasaki's work is what one would quite precisely call a psychological novel ... I dare to recommend this book to those who read me. The English translation that has inspired this brief insufficient note is called The Tale of Genji."[41] It is noted for its internal consistency, psychological depiction, and characterization. The novelist Yasunari Kawabata said in his Nobel Prize acceptance speech: "The Tale of Genji in particular is the highest pinnacle of Japanese literature. Even down to our day there has not been a piece of fiction to compare with it." >The Genji is also often referred to as "the first novel",[42] though there is considerable debate over this; other texts that predate Genji, such as the 7th-century Sanskrit Kādambari, or the Greek and Roman novels from classical antiquity, such as Daphnis and Chloe and the Satyricon, are considered to be novels, and there is debate around whether Genji can even be considered a "novel". Some[who?] consider the psychological insight, complexity and unity of the work to qualify it for "novel" status while simultaneously disqualifying earlier works of prose fiction.[43] Others[who?] see these arguments as subjective and unconvincing. Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>15569430 When's the 4th?
Anonymous
>>15569461 >>15569441 >>15569437 >>15569418 >>15569416 The women who were gang raped in the Boxer rebellion were Manchu and Mongol banner women.
In 1900, all seven of former Manchu governor Yulu's (Yu Luh 裕禄) (1844-1900) daughters were repeatedly gang raped by western soldiers in the Boxer rebellion in Beijing (which was Manchu majority at the time) after Yulu himself died in the war.
>Western and Japanese soldiers mass raped Manchu women and Mongol banner women in the Tartar Banner inner city of Beijing in siheyuan hutongs in the city. Sawara Tokusuke, a Japanese journalist wrote in "Miscellaneous Notes about the Boxers," (Sawara 268) about the rapes of Manchu and Mongol banner girls like when Manchu bannerman Yulu 裕禄 of the Hitara clan was killed in Yangcun and his seven daughters gang raped in the Heavenly palace (Sawara 268).[172] Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>15569461 >>15569441 >>15569437 >>15569418 >>15569416 >>15572876,1 A daughter and wife of Mongol banner noble Chongqi 崇绮 of the Alute clan were gang raped. (Sawara 266). Multiple relatives including his son Baochu killed themselves after he killed himself on 26 August 1900. (Fang 75).[173]
Anonymous
Judaeo-Boleshivsm doesn't seem like a conspiracy theory.
Anonymous
>>16270115 >The Jewish Century by Yuri Slezkine Interesting book.
Anonymous
>>16273565 >For the Marxists, Slezkine writes, freedom was “the coincidence of the human will with the will of God” - if for the word God you substitute history, whose arc must naturally bend toward justice. The voice of history was the Party, which was embodied in the person of its leader, who gave the correct line. In this way, history offered a release from the agony of the Russian, especially Jewish, intellectual, who had a habit of “asking ‘the accursed questions’ over lunch and dinner; falling deeper and deeper into doubt and confusion as a matter of principle.” Lenin provided the answers just as Christian theology had done, by insisting that correct thinking removes all doubt. >But Bolshevism also needed visible results. The goal was “to produce harmonious men and women who love what they cannot escape.” “Communism was about conquering the kingdom of necessity by submitting to it,” by showing self-discipline with even the most minor tasks. Yet what the Soviet Union eventually turned into was a place where, as the Brezhnev-era joke went, you pretended to work and they pretended to pay you. The spiritual fervor had died out. >In contrast to most sects, Bolshevism didn’t much care about its followers’ private lives. This was because Marxism had “a remarkably flat conception of human nature.” The Bolsheviks had nothing to say about how to have sex or raise children as a Communist. Unlike other Millenarians, they did not try for a complete remaking of the human being. A worldwide overturning of property relations, the Marxists thought, would rapidly lead to a revolution in everything. Cooperation would blossom, work and freedom become one. >The Bolsheviks also preserved traditional Russian culture. Their educational system focused on Pushkin, Gogol, and Tolstoy rather than Marxist texts. As Slezkine remarks, these were anti-Bolshevik books: consider War and Peace with its attack on grand schemes and sweeping historical judgments. Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>16273569 >Jewish matters bring out Slezkine’s wicked sense of humor, here as in The Jewish Century (2004), his sweeping, scholarly masterpiece. The Hebrew God, Slezkine notices in The House of Government, resembles Dostoevsky’s underground man, constantly boasting about his superiority. As for Lenin, he was the Bolshevik Moses, “a true prophet who could both lead his people through the parting waves and attend, one way or another, to their every petulant complaint.” >The Jewish Century is full of bravura set pieces on everything from the Jewish nose to Joyce’s Ulysses, Einstein, and Freud. The book’s plotline is that modernist universalism really means nationalism, with every nation a suffering chosen people in its own eyes. In the 20th century, the most cosmopolitan one ever, no one was allowed to be a cosmopolitan. The “mercurial” Jews, as Slezkine calls them, those ambitious orphans who threw away tradition and liked to skate between foreign cultures, wound up either choosing a nation to belong to or, in the shape of Zionism, inventing one. >Russianness was supremely important to secular Russian Jews, those lovers of Pushkin par excellence. But it was easier for Philip Roth’s Swede Lvov to become a bucolic American squire in Old Rimrock, New Jersey, than for Russian Jews to become truly Russian. When the Great Patriotic War came, Soviet mythology recentered itself around Russianness, and the Jews who formed so much of Bolshevism’s inner circles and its artistic elite began to look like strangers, not “real” Russians. https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/arts-letters/articles/yuri-slezkines-house-of-government Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>16270115 Except that most Jews were forced to live in the Pale of Settlement is the reality of Tsarist times.
And that most Bolsheviks weren't Jewish.
Such as notable ones, Stasova, Stalin, Beria, Kalinin, Kirov, and Voroshilov.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Love him or hate him, you must admit that he's the modern-day Socrates
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>16213720 He discovered Alden's Number
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>16215351 >. It is akin to playing a soccer game which one is winning 3-0, but the other side refuses to acknowledge the defeat arguing that what really counts is the number of shots on goal ... All attempts to drive the discussion back to the original topic, and to the argument to which they have no valid counterpoint, fail in the face of this intransigent tactic which consistently shifts the realm of the discussion elsewhere like arguing with christcucks on /his/
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>16213547 >>16214458 Fuck, now with the faggots having guns how am i supposed to tell them they're not women as an evil chud?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>16215351 Thing about football is so insane.
Football got clear and objective metrics for who wins the game.
Discussions don't
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>16215351 The article's observations about Stalinists in general are apt, though I wish the author went into further detail about nationalists.
But I feel the article drops the ball in concluding that discussion is fruitless instead of that those people weren't engaging in honest discussion in the first place.